Arkansas Guardian Ad Litem

In some family law cases, the court appoints a Guardian ad Litem—often called an “ad litem”—to represent the best interests of a child. This role is different from representing a parent. The ad litem’s job is to provide the court with an objective, child-focused perspective so that the child’s needs, safety, and welfare are fully considered during the case.

Ad litem appointments most commonly arise in contested custody and visitation disputes, cases involving allegations of abuse or neglect, and other proceedings where the court needs independent information about what is happening in the child’s life. The ad litem is typically an attorney appointed by the judge, and the scope of the appointment is set by court order and applicable Arkansas rules.

Ad litem work is investigative and fact-driven. A thorough ad litem representation generally includes reviewing pleadings and prior orders, interviewing parents and caregivers, and meeting with the child in an age-appropriate way. It may also involve speaking with teachers, counselors, physicians, or other professionals who have relevant information, and reviewing records such as school reports, counseling notes, medical documentation, or DHS materials when applicable.

After gathering information, the ad litem analyzes the facts through the legal standard the court must apply—typically the child’s best interests. That analysis often includes stability, the child’s routine, each parent’s involvement, the child’s developmental needs, and any safety concerns. In some cases, the ad litem may participate in settlement discussions or propose practical parenting provisions to reduce conflict and protect the child.

At hearings, an ad litem may present recommendations to the court, question witnesses, and advocate for child-centered outcomes. The goal is not to “pick a side,” but to provide professional guidance based on the evidence and the child’s welfare.

Because the court relies on the ad litem’s work, effective representation requires preparation, neutrality, and careful communication—so the judge receives clear, reliable information to make decisions affecting a child’s future.